<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Simply Google&#8221; &#8211; emphasis on the sarcastic use of quotes!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forgreatjustice.net/2006/04/12/simply-google-emphasis-on-the-sarcastic-use-of-quotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forgreatjustice.net/2006/04/12/simply-google-emphasis-on-the-sarcastic-use-of-quotes/</link>
	<description>this is an occaisionablog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:49:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nabeel hyatt</title>
		<link>http://blog.forgreatjustice.net/2006/04/12/simply-google-emphasis-on-the-sarcastic-use-of-quotes/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>nabeel hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forgreatjustice.net/2006/04/12/simply-google-emphasis-on-the-sarcastic-use-of-quotes/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>design is, at it&#039;s heart, about making choices for the user. this might sound totalitarian, but that&#039;s clearly what it is.

we know the full raft of every single feature, but to display all of this in the same heirarchy, in the same density, is to require an expertly trained eye (think about the cockpit of an airplane).

google may be an extreme example, but it is indeed a valuable one. from the headline of a newspaper to the layout of a webpage, designers make important decisions not just about how important information is, but whether it should be shown at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>design is, at it&#8217;s heart, about making choices for the user. this might sound totalitarian, but that&#8217;s clearly what it is.</p>
<p>we know the full raft of every single feature, but to display all of this in the same heirarchy, in the same density, is to require an expertly trained eye (think about the cockpit of an airplane).</p>
<p>google may be an extreme example, but it is indeed a valuable one. from the headline of a newspaper to the layout of a webpage, designers make important decisions not just about how important information is, but whether it should be shown at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->
